#1: We’re driving less. During any
recession, people tend to economize by driving less, and the Great Recession
was no exception. But even a
slight improvement in the economy since 2009 hasn’t resulted in greater use of
the car, unlike
in other recessions up to the mid 1990s. Less driving means less gas consumption means less gas tax
revenue. What it doesn’t mean is
less wear and tear because, increasingly, we’re using public transit and alternatives
to gas-powered vehicles.
#2. Like
Dylan, we’re going electric. Sure,
the technology is still developing and it’s been talked about for a long, long
time but it seems the disruptive change we’ve been waiting for in the auto
industry is finally here and California is leading the way. A recent survey of transportation
trends in Palo
Alto revealed that one fifth of all households had switched to alternative
fuel vehicles.
#3: Our
kids (and grandkids) won’t buy as many cars. Of course, kids will buy cars, but the pressure to buy isn’t
as great for a demographic that is increasingly urban (vs. suburban), comfortable
with public transit and eco-friendly.
Factor in things like cost and upkeep, and gas-consumption cars will be
less attractive propositions for future generations. Plus, you
can’t text and drive.
#4: We’re being
encouraged to walk and bike more. The
Palo Alto study also revealed that 93 percent of households reported owning at
least one bicycle, while 53 percent owned four or more bicycles. Other national
studies show more of us are commuting by bike.
#5. Rising
fuel economy = lower consumption. Whether you agree with it or not, we’re legislating away
future gas sales by requiring more efficient gas powered vehicles. This year’s cars are expected to average
24 mpg, an increase from 2012’s 23.6 mpg. So, even if we do buy more gas powered cars in the future
(we won’t) each car will use far less gas. The trend is clear and is one of the biggest reasons we need
an alternative to the gas tax for funding transportation infrastructure.
No comments:
Post a Comment